this super great essay about black widow and feminism (via helio-phile)
(It’s really funny to me when excerpts from things I write get more notes than actual things I write. I’m real bad at the micro part of microblogging.)
this super great essay about black widow and feminism (via helio-phile)
(It’s really funny to me when excerpts from things I write get more notes than actual things I write. I’m real bad at the micro part of microblogging.)
Made rebloggable by request.
Argh holy shit, this is so accurate.
Reporter: So, why do you write these strong female characters?
Joss Whedon: Because you’re still asking me that question.The question should be “Why do you write seemingly strong women and then punish them for that strength?” I see a lot of characters in this set who got shit on by Joss not to mention at least one actress he fired for the crime of getting pregnant.
A friend of mine likes to challenge “Joss Whedon, Feminist” acolytes to name a female character on Buffy who doesn’t die or go crazy.
I feel like this game could be expanded to find lead female characters who don’t die, go crazy, or lose a loved one in a gruesome way as part of their suffering. Bonus points if they get to the end without anyone threatening to rape them or trying to rape them. There has to be at least one right?
If we include those, we may as well be playing bingo. Joss Whedon’s female characters’ punishments: collect them all!
Who gets mind wiped? Who gets beaten? Who watches everything she ever loved burn? It’s a game for all ages! Bonus points for the ones who die without ever having gotten to live!
I might have feelings about Kendra. A lot of them.
Goddamit, and now I feel compelled to do an actual tally of his original female characters, albeit offhand and from memory. So:
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Buffy - two deaths, one rape threat, one attempted rape, two sexual assaults, one dead parent.
Willow - one rape threat, two breaks with sanity, one dead girlfriend.
Cordelia - damselled about a billion times, one attempted forced marriage.
Anya - one rape threat, dead.
Tara - dead.
Kendra - dead.
Faith - multiple breaks with sanity.
Ms Calender - dead.
Joyce - dead.
Dawn - one attempted forced marriage, one dead parent.
Darla - dead.
Drusilla - multiple breaks with sanity.
[I don’t know enough about angel, I cut this part]Firefly
Kaylee - one rape threat.
River - multiple breaks with sanity.
Zoe - one dead husband.
Inara - one threat of sexual assault.
[I don’t know enough about doll house, I cut this part]I should probably leave this hornet’s nest alone. But I’m pissed off right now, because today I learned people think Joss Whedon is sexist for putting his female characters through the wringer.
As if a fundamental part of the hero’s journey isn’t suffering, having loved ones die, or dying themselves. As if he doesn’t do that to EVERYONE he writes. Here are some of his male characters’ trials, in the same form as above (and this is just the stuff I remember off the top of my head):
Giles - one dead lover/dear friend, brutally tortured at least once
Xander - one threat of sexual assault, implied childhood abuse, at least one break with reality (that made him leave Anya at the altar), one dead lover, loses an eye
Spike - sexually assaulted by his mother, attempted forced marriage (the same spell that got Buffy), brutally tortured, at least one break with sanity, one death
Riley - turned into a meat puppet by
FrankensoldierAdamAngel - tortured in hell, at least one death, lots of other stuff I don’t remember because Angel bores me
Wash - brutally tortured, dead
Mal - brutally tortured
Book - dead
And what do I see when I look at the female characters listed above?
Buffy - survives the series with a hopeful heart, comes up with a plan to break an explicitly patriarchal tradition, saves the world a lot, allowed to be flawed and messy and still strong
Willow - survives the series, finds love again after the death of her soulmate, grows from an awkward high school girl to a junkie to the most powerful witch in history
Dawn - survives the series, grows from an annoying little sister to a competent young woman
Faith - survives the series, seemingly a “bad girl” stereotype who actually has depth and a compelling misled-by-evil-(and-love) —> redemption arc
Cordelia - seemingly a “shallow girl” stereotype who actually has depth and comes through when her friends need her despite being out of her element
Anya - a former monster who switches sides, finds and loses love but consciously steps away from deadly coping mechanisms, can run a store better than Giles, illuminates humanity in compelling ways
Tara - shy and unassuming, wise and compassionate and forgiving. She can’t beat up monsters, but that’s okay, she’s still part of the team.
For fuck’s sake. It’s supernatural genre television, not tiptoeing through fields of daisies. People will die. People will be threatened. Sometimes it will happen as a plot device. If you write a lot of female characters (I saw something earlier like the percentage of women in primetime shows is like 17%, which Whedon obviously blows out of the water), a lot of them are going to have horrible things happen to them.
But what Whedon does that’s so different from most is he writes female characters as people. He doesn’t portray stereotypical femininity and strength as mutually exclusive. He shows that physical strength isn’t the only “real” strength they can have. He gives them diverse personalities and shows how they’re all powerful and weak in their own way. He lets them grow and evolve organically. He lets them be compelling villains. He lets them be sympathetic victims. He lets them be fearless warriors for good. Sometimes all three. He lets them make horrible mistakes and successfully atone for them. He shows them suffering for plot-related reasons, doesn’t shy away from the after-effects (versus, say, Deanna Troi in TNG - so much of the stuff that happened to her was gratuitous) and shows them getting back up.
Also, don’t you dare pretend Joyce’s death can be reduced to part of some anti-feminist pattern (for three separate characters, no less. And the fact that Buffy even had a parent in the first place is unusual for the hero archetype). That kind of thing actually happens in the real world, it was handled with incredible sensitivity and realism, and watching Buffy and Dawn go through the grieving process is something many people relate to intensely. It’s fantastic writing. It’s good conflict. It’s good television.
If anyone is writing off Joss’ female characters, it’s you. It’s the people who act like these characters are little more than a list of tragic and biased casualties, and fuck everything else they accomplish.
^*slow claps it out*
Oh my God.
Thank you. I have been told a million times that Joss is anti-feminist and every time I’ve tried to argue against that but I haven’t been able to do it this magnificently.
oh my GOD.
I was SO HOPING when I saw this pop up on my dash AGAIN that someone had finally added the eloquently-worded rebuttal to it that I feel I am incapable of writing because the only Jossverse show I know backwards/forwards/inside and out is Firefly, lol. (I mean, I have watched a significant portion of his other stuff too, just not in the I-can-write-eloquent-meta-about-this-source-material way.)
“Bad shit happens to this character” is not the same as “the writers are mistreating this character in a fundamentally problematic way,” particularly when the character lives in a universe where bad shit happens all the time. I love that fandom means consuming entertainment mindfully instead of mindlessly, but I feel like sometimes certain subsets of fandom have a tendency to make the evidence fit their desired conclusion instead of the other way around.
Ultimately, no one is perfect, including Joss Whedon. There are issues he could have handled with more sensitivity, there are maybe some jokes he shouldn’t have written. But that’s because he’s a human being and human beings make mistakes. His mistakes don’t invalidate all the great stuff he has also done, however, or negate the positive effect he has had and continues to have on women in media.
Beautifully done. I absolutely despise poorly thought out feminist critiques of media, and there’s nothing I love more than seeing them countered by well-written and well thought out counter critiques.
Dear DC Comics,
Please explain to me why there are two pages—-two pages—of your DC Entertainment Essential Graphic Novels and Chronology 2013 devoted to the women who appear in your comics. Is this seriously the best you can do? Am I supposed to be honored that you even gave women a chance? If your excuse is that there aren’t many prominent women in the DC lineup, then a) that is not excuse, that is the actual problem, and b) how dare you do what you did to Wonder Woman.Wonder Woman is a member of the World’s Finest Trinity, and you give her a mention of 2 volumes lumped together with other women (of the Batman continuity), rather than the four pages you allotted Batman and Superman (six, if you count their fancy intro pages), the three pages you gave Green Lantern, and the pages you gave The Flash and Green Arrow.DC, do better. You dishonor me.
Yet another example of DC being a bag of dicks :C
It’s almost like Marvel and DC take turns on being marginally decent— a few years back it was Marvel being awful and gross.
This is what the school-to-prison pipeline looks like. This is how black youth criminalized.
- She was doing a science experiment
- She’s being charged as an ADULT
- She’s being charged with a FELONY
If this all goes the way the prosecution wants, this young woman will be LEGALLY discriminated against for the rest of her life. No voting, housing discrimination, employment discrimination (as if getting a job while black isn’t hard enough), etc. etc.
There is a petition up … spread the word.
http://www.change.org/petitions/the-bartow-police-and-bartow-high-school-drop-charges-against-kiera-wilmot
Hey, remember this from yesterday? Go ahead and hit up the petition.
“Being a woman is not a means to humiliate and punish anyone”
After a policeman in the Iranian Kurdish town of Marivan paraded an accused criminal in traditional Kurdish women’s clothes in the streets in order to humiliate him, women marched in the city condemning the use of women’s attire as a kind of humiliation.
In support, an internet campaign of Kurdish and other Iranian men has sprung up showing men wearing Kurdish women’s clothes and messages and support. For example, this message says,”wearing Kurdish women’s clothes is not only not an insult, it is instead a great honor for us,” and goes on to describe how women stand side by side with men in every part of society and during wartime.
Support the campaign by liking the page!
زن بودن ابزار تحقیر و تنبیه هیچ کس نیست(via Ajam Media Collective)
WOW
Why I Am a Male Feminist
The word turns off a lot of men (insert snarky comment about man-hating feminazis here) — and women. But here’s why black men should …be embracing the “f” word.
Like most guys, I had bought into the stereotype that all feminists were white, lesbian, unattractive male bashers who hated all men. But after reading the work of these black feminists, I realized that this was far from the truth. After digging into their work, I came to really respect the intelligence, courage and honesty of these women.
Feminists did not hate men. In fact, they loved men. But just as my father had silenced my mother during their arguments to avoid hearing her gripes, men silenced feminists by belittling them in order to dodge hearing the truth about who we are.
I learned that feminists offered an important critique about a male-dominated society that routinely, and globally, treated women like second-class citizens. They spoke the truth, and even though I was a man, their truth spoke to me. Through feminism, I developed a language that helped me better articulate things that I had experienced growing up as a male.
Feminist writings about patriarchy, racism, capitalism and structural sexism resonated with me because I had witnessed firsthand the kind of male dominance they challenged. I saw it as a child in my home and perpetuated it as an adult. Their analysis of male culture and male behavior helped me put my father’s patriarchy into a much larger social context, and also helped me understand myself better.
I decided that I loved feminists and embraced feminism. Not only does feminism give woman a voice, but it also clears the way for men to free themselves from the stranglehold of traditional masculinity. When we hurt the women in our lives, we hurt ourselves, and we hurt our community, too.
~ Byron Hurt
Read his entire post: http://www.theroot.com/views/why-i-am-male-feminist?page=0%2C0Photo by Ellis Binks
I’ve read a lot of great essays about how fandom is female-majority and creates a female gaze and a safe space for women and etc. But spend five minutes in fandom and you’ll have an unsettling question.
Why does a female-majority, feminist…
When feminists insist that Islam is sexist because men and women pray separately.
Yes, because I need to be around men 24/7 in order for us to be equal. Because having a literal safe space to be intimate in worship is pure inequality. Wow, I didn’t know the error of my ways!
Takbir!
Allahu Akbar!
Don’t y’all know? Everyone BUT Western, White women is doing feminism WRONG!
Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) have provided safe and effective care in the United States for over four decades. When the Affordable Care ACT (ACA) is fully implemented in 2014 over 30 million Americans will gain coverage under the law. APRNs currently have barriers to practice which include requirements for being supervised by or having a collaborative agreement with a physician, inability to admit patients into hospice or home health and restrictions on prescription of controlled drugs.There is currently a shortage of primary care physicians and the restriction to APRN practice limits patients access to care. Advanced practice registered nurses should be allowed to practice to their full scope of education and training.
Tumblr! This petition could use some of your magic. We need almost 80,000 more signatures by April 22. Please reblog! Allowing advanced practice registered nurses to practice to their full scope is so important. APRNs most commonly have a DNP: Doctor of Nursing Practice, which is an additional three years of schooling on top of receiving their BSN (sometimes on top of also already having a Master’s degree), plus most DNP programs require at least a year of actual nursing practice before you can be admitted.
Additionally, though there are many nurses who are not women now, it is still a profession dominated by women and its evolution as a professional occupation runs parallel to the feminist movement. Nurses used to work autonomously in very poor or isolated communities early on, but that roll was restricted by law when doctors (then predominantly men) lobbied congress and fought to ensure that the nurse’s place was always inferior to the doctor’s. This isn’t to say that doctors don’t play their own important and essential function in healthcare, but nursing doesn’t seek to replace doctors. Any nurses’ scope of practice is still not as broad as a doctor’s, but APRNs deserve and should operate autonomously and some of the reason they don’t is undoubtedly because of the stigma of nursing being “women’s work” and in need of supervision.
Additionally, many women who are nurses are working mothers and they will work years in the field and gain so much experience before they continue on in their education, which means most DNPs that I know don’t just have 7 years of education under their belt. They have entire lifetimes of experience and knowledge on top of their traditional education.
So yeah, this should appeal to Tumblr on just a “it makes sense” level, but also a feminist level. SO PLEASE REBLOG THIS Y’ALL.